If non traditional arrangements are unworkable then they die out,. Why be afraid of things you think are doomed to fail? Why oppose things that work?
Also, I'd be much more willing to tolerate them if there were schools I could send my children to where they weren't encouraged to "find of if they're gay" or "find out if they're trans".
Why? Because it's all imprinting? Heterosexuality is right because it is an inherent default, yet, so un-inherent that the rumour of an alternative will convert people?
Also if progressives are so in favor of "allowing other systems to operate", why to they freak out whenever some hamlet in the Bible Belt decides to teach creationism?
There's a difference between teaching creationism and teaching only creationism.
If non traditional arrangements are unworkable then they die out,. Why be afraid of things you think are doomed to fail?
The question is what they'll take out with them when they do fail.
Why? Because it's all imprinting?
Not all imprinting but there's certainly some of that.
Heterosexuality is right because it is an inherent default,
No, heterosexuality (and monogamy) is right because it is an effective system for raising children.
yet, so un-inherent that the rumour of an alternative will convert people?
It will convert some people and cause oth...
Through LessWrong, I've discovered the no-reactionary movement. Servery says that there are some of you here.
I'm curious, what lead you to accept the basic premises of the movement? What is the story of your personal "conversion"? Was there some particular insight or information that was important in convincing you? Was it something that just "clicked" for you or that you had always felt in a vague way? Were any of you "raised in it"?
Feel free to forward my questions to others or direct me towards a better forum for asking this.
I hope that this is in no way demeaning or insulting. I'm genuinely curious and my questioning is value free. If you point me towards compelling evidence of the neo-reactionary premise, I'll update on it.