Beluga comments on Linked decisions an a "nice" solution for the Fermi paradox - Less Wrong

2 Post author: Beluga 07 December 2014 02:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

Sort By: Best

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Beluga 08 December 2014 10:56:08PM 1 point [-]

Not sure I understand your question, but:

I assume that each civilization only cares about itself. So one civilization succeeding does not "lead to large positive utilities for all future civilisations", only for itself. If civilization A assigns positive or negative value to civilization B succeeding, the expected utility calculations become more complicated.
You cannot "let the game end". The fact that the game ends when one player receives R only represents the fact that each player knows that no previous player has received R (i.e., we arguably know that no civilization so far has successfully colonized space in our neighborhood).

Comment author: habeuscuppus 10 December 2014 09:57:10PM 0 points [-]

Wouldn't it be more accurate to state that R represents an enduring multi-system technological civilization and not mere colonial presence?

I don't think we can arguably claim that space in our stellar neighborhood has never been colonized, just that it does not appear to be currently