atorm comments on Negative polyamory outcomes? - Less Wrong

14 Post author: atorm 05 January 2015 12:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (103)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 05 January 2015 05:02:57PM 17 points [-]

If your partner having multiple partners while you don't is an unacceptable outcome for you then you definitely ought to get clear with your partner on what you'll do about it (collectively) if that happens before you start inviting other partners.

From what I've seen (monogamous man in a very poly-friendly social environment) yes, this is an issue that comes up, and yes, it's an expression of partners' insecurities. (This isn't intended as a dismissal; people have insecurities and relationships need to deal with those insecurities somehow.) It strikes me as similar to the issues some people have with partners who are significantly more romatically/sexually experienced than they are. In some ways it's also similar to the issues some people have with spouses who out-earn them financially.

One poly married couple I know deals with this by the wife, who is far more socially adept, helping her husband find other partners.

One approach you might consider is asking whether there's anything extra your primary partner could provide during the periods when she's more connected than you are that would make you feel less "raw end."

I infer from your assumptions that you're straight, but if not you might find it easier to find male poly-compatible partners than female ones. (In my experience it's less that women have an easier time finding dates, and more that it's easier to find male dates.)

Comment author: atorm 06 January 2015 12:52:44PM 0 points [-]

Man, imagine if Eliezer or some other big name wrote "Bi-hacking" and LessWrong became known for all the deliberate bisexuals.

Comment author: DanielLC 07 January 2015 05:19:50AM 5 points [-]
Comment author: atorm 07 January 2015 01:07:50PM 1 point [-]

I wonder if that would work. Also, where is the compelling internal dialogue about the value of being bisexual?

Comment author: falenas108 08 January 2015 01:18:50AM 1 point [-]

There was definitely something Eliezer said about bisexuality being strictly superior because then you would just be attracted to more people. I was 16 and straight when I read that, and I wanted to be bi since then. Then, about 3 years ago, I became* bi.

*It's weird, but there was a definite point where I started being attracted to more than one gender.

Comment author: [deleted] 10 January 2015 08:29:36PM 4 points [-]

Yeah, this is possible. I did it a while ago because local status systems, then reversed it once I got out of those status systems and it was no longer useful.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 06 January 2015 04:57:34PM 0 points [-]

I'd be entertained. But I'd also be surprised.

In my experience a lot of people who identify (or are identified) as straight or gay are actually some flavor of bi and just "round themselves off" (or are rounded off by observers) for convenience or out of habit, but a lot aren't.

The former can choose to change how they identify and behave, and are sometimes happier for it; the latter not so much.