torekp comments on LINK: Diseases not sufficiently researched - Less Wrong

2 Post author: polymathwannabe 17 January 2015 04:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: torekp 17 January 2015 11:59:58PM 1 point [-]

Metus pointed out that the funding has "a bias for infectious diseases". That seems like a good criterion to add, at least when it comes to emerging diseases - diseases that haven't laid claim to many life-years yet, but might in the future. Mac made a similar point. But yeah, basically, the author nailed it.