skeptical_lurker comments on Optimal eating (or rather, a step in the right direction) - Less Wrong

5 Post author: c_edwards 19 January 2015 01:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (65)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 21 January 2015 08:18:26PM 0 points [-]

Wikipedia says:

A 1999 meta-analysis of five studies comparing vegetarian and non-vegetarian mortality rates in Western countries found that in comparison with regular meat-eaters, mortality from ischemic heart disease was 34% lower in pescetarians, 34% lower in ovo-lacto vegetarians, 26% lower in vegans and 20% lower in occasional meat-eaters.[9]

Now it's possible that this correlation does not imply causation. Its also possible that the meat-eaters are eating low-quality processed meat, or are overcooking their meat.

Fish does pose worries about mercury. I have been considering going pescetarian at some point in the future, but if I can get the same benefit by using olive oil instead of sunflower oil then I won't bother.

Comment author: Lumifer 21 January 2015 08:27:57PM *  1 point [-]

I am aware of observational studies. But if you want to quote some, please find ones which examine total mortality and at least discuss the confounding factors.

E.g. this is a better example, but note that in this case they lump fish and chicken together under "white meat".

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 21 January 2015 08:45:38PM 0 points [-]

[Standard disclaimer about confounding in these types of studies being even harder than normal.]