MathiasZaman comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, January 2015, chapter 103 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: b_sen 29 January 2015 01:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (173)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MathiasZaman 29 January 2015 08:55:49PM *  4 points [-]

The following chapters together will be at least as long as Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. There might be room for all sort of directions. Some stories work very well with endings that quickly escalate.

All in all, it seems likely that there will still be interesting plot threads left, and most of the characters will still be alive. So will there be a sequel?

Not from Yudkowsky. He has said before that he wants to wrap up all the plot points in this story.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 29 January 2015 10:02:09PM 8 points [-]

Some stories work very well with endings that quickly escalate.

If he manages to fit everything in the last arc, then never mind 'quickly escalate' its going to be a literary singularity.

Comment author: Baughn 31 January 2015 01:25:57PM *  3 points [-]

The final arc is 90,000 words. That's a fairly large book on its own; there's time enough, if he's even halfway terse.

Comment author: Alsadius 01 February 2015 03:32:32AM 0 points [-]

90,000 words. That's a fairly large book

I don't think you read as much epic fantasy as I do.

Comment author: Baughn 01 February 2015 04:20:20AM *  1 point [-]

I've read Worm. Does that count?

However, getting your point across with fewer words is also a skill. 90,000 is enough to describe quite a lot of things happening.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 01 February 2015 12:17:47PM 3 points [-]

EY for better or worse is generally quite verbose, although out of the whole of HPMOR the only part I felt was superfluous was Hermine vs the bullies.

Comment author: Alsadius 02 February 2015 04:51:00AM 0 points [-]

It does, but my comment was intended as a joke.