Ah.... "genuine uncertainty" the term reminds me of "no true scotsman argument". My point being, there's an uncertainty reduction before and after the die was rolled, not to say this means, I should update my belief about the die's rolled/winning value.
Simply put my friend Naomi's beliefs have been updated and uncertainty in her mind has been eliminated. I think the author was trying to point out that most people conflate the two differences. It definitely is well worded for rhetoric, but not for pedagogy(in Feynman sense).
What does it mean to have uncertainty reduction taking place outside of the frame of reference of the person being asked for a decision?
In other terms, the discussion would have been the same if they replaced Naomi with a camera that is automatically used to take a picture.
Another month, another rationality quotes thread. The rules are: