Lumifer comments on Innate Mathematical Ability - Less Wrong

40 Post author: JonahSinick 18 February 2015 11:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (140)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 23 February 2015 06:12:46PM 1 point [-]

Suppose, hypothetically, that human brains were such that IQ was capped at 145 ... it would look like the correlation between IQ and real world outcomes vanishes after 145

In your hypothetical there would be a lot of warning signs -- for example all IQs above 145 would be random, that is, re-testing IQs above 145 would produce a random draw from the appropriate distribution tail.

And I suspect that it should be possible to figure out real-world distributions (the fatness of the tails, in particular), by looking at raw, non-normalized test scores.

Comment author: JonahSinick 23 February 2015 06:20:45PM 2 points [-]

Yes, you and I are on the same page, I was just saying that IQ shouldn't be defined to be normally distributed.