alienist comments on The Galileo affair: who was on the side of rationality? - Less Wrong

35 Post author: Val 15 February 2015 08:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: alienist 17 February 2015 06:28:07AM 6 points [-]

Before Newton unified terrestial and celestial mechanics, you needed to keep them separate whether you were using a geocentric or a heliocentric model. You still needed a sublunary sphere sphere around the Earth where things slow down and fall and break and decay on their way towards the End of Time, while God and the Angels watch us from their perfect and immutable Heaven. Neither the geocentric nor the heliocentric model had an advantage in terms of explanatory power here.

If the earth has a sublunary sphere, that suggests the earth is 'special', which is certainly more parsimonious in a geocentric universe. Also why doesn't earth's sublunary sphere cause it to fall into the sun?

Comment author: V_V 17 February 2015 04:38:10PM 0 points [-]

If the earth has a sublunary sphere, that suggests the earth is 'special', which is certainly more parsimonious in a geocentric universe.

Either way the Earth has to be special.

Also why doesn't earth's sublunary sphere cause it to fall into the sun?

Because nobody figured out that the Sun had gravity before Newton.