Douglas_Knight comments on Easy wins aren't news - Less Wrong

39 Post author: PhilGoetz 19 February 2015 07:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 20 February 2015 12:09:01PM 2 points [-]

I think the result should be a net gain to society, as is generally the case when you make markets more efficient.

Taking power away from the most powerful actors is often good a net gain for society. That doesn't make it a "easy win".

Matt Taibbi writing about the municipal bond market is worth reading:

Along with virtually every major bank and finance company on Wall Street – not just GE, but J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, UBS, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Wachovia and more – these three Wall Street wiseguys spent the past decade taking part in a breathtakingly broad scheme to skim billions of dollars from the coffers of cities and small towns across America. The banks achieved this gigantic rip-off by secretly colluding to rig the public bids on municipal bonds, a business worth $3.7 trillion.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 22 February 2015 05:24:49PM 1 point [-]

That article is not about the municipal bond market. It is certainly not about the interest rate on municipal bonds. It's true that the quote says so, but the rest of the article says not.