lerjj comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, February 2015, chapter 109 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Gondolinian 23 February 2015 08:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (160)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lerjj 23 February 2015 09:04:40PM *  1 point [-]

Yes, that does work. Thanks for that (upvoted now, seemed unfair). This is less convenient, but more general. Cheers.

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 23 February 2015 09:17:29PM *  3 points [-]

Just curious, what's wrong with someone who gave advice that 1. was asked for and 2. the asker found useful, getting upvotes?

Comment author: lerjj 23 February 2015 09:27:23PM 1 point [-]

Fair point. I suppose it was that if everyone posted subtle variations on a theme it's a way to vote mine. Or simply copy someone else's answer, write in an "Edit: ninja'd" and hope for accidental votes.

Having said that, looking at the HTML is a much more general solution and probably does deserve an up-vote. But the principle was to only give a vote to the first person to answer, because after that help is technically unsolicited (since they can see it's already been given).