= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Manfred comments on Journal 'Basic and Applied Psychology' bans p<0.05 and 95% confidence intervals - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (7)
What about p = 0.001?
As they explain, at the link, they are realio trulio banning null hypothesis significance testing. This is neat!
Neat in what sense? (i.e., in a popcorn-worthy or a methodological progress sense?)
Also, does this ban make sense for the entire field of psychology, or perhaps just for 'feelings' parameters that range from icky to awesome?