= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Dan_Moore comments on Journal 'Basic and Applied Psychology' bans p<0.05 and 95% confidence intervals - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (7)
As they explain, at the link, they are realio trulio banning null hypothesis significance testing. This is neat!
Neat in what sense? (i.e., in a popcorn-worthy or a methodological progress sense?)
Also, does this ban make sense for the entire field of psychology, or perhaps just for 'feelings' parameters that range from icky to awesome?