thomblake comments on When None Dare Urge Restraint - Less Wrong

41 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 December 2007 11:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (118)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Dojan 17 October 2011 02:25:37AM 1 point [-]

What a non-answer.

Or, put differently, I do not understand what you mean by this, could you please explain?

Comment author: thomblake 17 October 2011 03:33:28PM *  -1 points [-]

Some words in English have normative value as part of their meaning. To say that someone is "good" is simply an ascription of value, while to say someone is "present" contains no ascription of value; however, to say that someone is "courageous" is both a description of their behavior and a statement that their character and/or actions are virtuous.

Thus, to say (for example) "his courage was vicious" is inconsistent.

ETA: And "is said in many ways" is an Aristotelian idiom roughly meaning "has multiple senses in common use".

Comment author: Bluehawk 26 April 2012 01:11:48AM 1 point [-]

While words have a normative value as part of their common use, I think the reason you're getting so many down votes for those comments is that "value" is only a behavioral mechanism on our own part. Lots of people ascribe negative or positive values to event X. Great. But that's just a response in the human brain(s) that observe(s) event X, not a part of event X itself.

And to say that "his courage was vicious" -- you know what, I like that. I'm going to look for a way to use that in prose.

Comment author: thomblake 26 April 2012 03:18:15PM 2 points [-]

I think the reason you're getting so many down votes...

I think it's more likely that I got downvotes because I was 1) telling people they're using a word wrong, and 2) invoking Aristotelian idioms in a context not friendly to Aristotle.

I'm not concerned.

"value" is only a behavioral mechanism on our own part. Lots of people ascribe negative or positive values to event X. Great. But that's just a response in the human brain(s) that observe(s) event X, not a part of event X itself.

That really isn't relevant. The words are also produced by human brains, and are often about value. If you say "good" and mean "bad", then you're using the word wrong. At a minimum, that's bad communication. And some words have "good" or "bad" as part of their meaning. If you don't want to imply virtue, you can say (for example) "bold" or "fearless" instead of "courageous" (if you want to imply vice, you can say "brash" or "reckless"). There are many words.