seer comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, March 2015, chapter 119 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Gondolinian 10 March 2015 06:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (339)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: seer 14 March 2015 01:57:07AM 5 points [-]

Hang on. Full stop. The idea that any form of sexism in a work means we need to get rid of that work is something I strongly, and fundamentally disagree with. No amount of sexism is a reason for censorship.

But you claim that any "sexism" (however you define it) in the work is bad.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 14 March 2015 03:09:01AM -1 points [-]

At minimum a cause for concern. But if you want to say bad, sure, as a decent approximation of the issue, yeah we can go with "bad".

Comment author: seer 14 March 2015 03:13:54AM 6 points [-]

Why? Also, how are you defining "sexism".

Comment author: JoshuaZ 14 March 2015 03:17:51AM *  -1 points [-]

I assign a very high probability that you just downvoted the comment you are replying to. This is generally often indicative of not being interested in a productive conversation. Did you do so?