sidhe3141 comments on Every Cause Wants To Be A Cult - Less Wrong

41 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 12 December 2007 03:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (31)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: poke 12 December 2007 07:14:26PM -1 points [-]

We really need to figure out how to create more cultishness. If you could build a cult around known science, which happily describes everything in human experience, and spread it, you'd do more good in the world than "rationality" or "overcoming bias" ever could.

Comment author: sidhe3141 11 November 2010 05:45:53PM 7 points [-]

No. Part of the definition of a cult is an unquestionable dogma, which runs counter to the core ideas of science. Building a cult around known science (even if you understand the principles well enough to avoid engaging in cargo cult science) is going to slow progress.

Comment author: Bluehawk 17 April 2012 01:11:06AM 0 points [-]

Consider replacing "core ideas of science" with "core ideas of society" and I'll wager that's closer to the commonly-used meaning of "cult".

Comment author: dlthomas 17 April 2012 03:56:27AM 2 points [-]

Dropping in mid thread, but I think you parsed that differently than intended; I read it as saying that the notion of unquestionable dogma runs counter to the core ideas of science, not that the dogma itself must run counter to anything in order to be a cult.

Comment author: Bluehawk 25 April 2012 08:39:26PM 1 point [-]

Ah. Yeah, I may have parsed that one incorrectly, now that you mention it. Thanks for pointing that out.