Lumifer comments on Succeess depends on finding a balance between "geek" and "jock" - Less Wrong

-8 [deleted] 12 March 2015 12:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 12 March 2015 02:58:38PM *  0 points [-]

why there should be free "fitness points" for a generic strategy change across a wide range of areas

I think you need to remember that "us geeks" are outliers, a tail of the distribution. For some things that's too far out of the mainstream and moving back towards the center would be useful. For comparison look at the other tail -- impulsive, not too smart, hold-mah-beer-and-watch-this people. Their "free fitness points" are in becoming more thoughtful, in reflecting more on themselves and the world, etc.

Having said that, I think that in specific cases -- particularly Russia under Stalin -- there was a significant enough culling of the population to affect the gene pool. Dumb and obedient people survived, smart and active did not.

Comment author: Romashka 12 March 2015 07:50:19PM 0 points [-]

Smart and obedient? Dumb and active?.. Just let them interbreed.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 March 2015 03:55:33PM 0 points [-]

I don't know enough about Russia under Stalin. I can believe that passivity was a good strategy, but how about knowing how to manipulate the system, if only in small ways?

Comment author: Lumifer 12 March 2015 04:15:04PM 0 points [-]

My impression is that periodic purges made any kind of success dangerous -- the best survival strategy was just to keep your head down and not stick out in any way.