Caledonian2 comments on Reversed Stupidity Is Not Intelligence - Less Wrong

49 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 12 December 2007 10:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Caledonian2 14 December 2007 12:01:10AM -1 points [-]

But everything is evidence about everything else. I don't see the problem at all.

Given the circumference of Jupiter around its equator, the height of the Statue of Liberty, and the price of tea in China, can you tell me what's sitting atop my computer monitor right now?

If so, what is it?

If not, why not? I gave you plenty of evidence.

Comment author: pnrjulius 05 July 2012 04:26:27AM 1 point [-]

I know with 99% probability that the item on top of your computer monitor is not Jupiter or the Statue of Liberty. And a major piece of information that leads me to that conclusion is... you guessed it, the circumference of Jupiter and the height of the Statue of Liberty. So there you go, this "irrelevant" information actually does narrow my probability estimates just a little bit.

Not a lot. But we didn't say it was good evidence, just that it was, in fact, evidence.

(Pedantic: You could have a model of Jupiter or Liberty on top of your computer, but that's not the same thing as having the actual thing.)