The article asks the questions of the reader, it doesn't just cite the poll as a tool used in standard experiments. I find the article's suggestion to answer such questions deplorable, as it requires the reader to at least play along with the confusion in the questions, instead of fixing or sidestepping it. Even as a tool, the problems with the questions suggest looking for better tools, although that's probably outside the scope of the article.
Here I talk about Julian Rotter's locus of control, and the implications of the research on our health, happiness and productivity.
As per my last article(s), feel free to let me know what you think here, privately, or anonymously.
Link