= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
buybuydandavis comments on Request for Steelman: Non-correspondence concepts of truth - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (74)
See paragraph
Epistemically accurate statements are only a subset of winning statements. Actually, that's only "some epistemically accurate statements", as others are losers in some use contexts.
Indeed: Some winning statements aren't true, so truth shouldn't be casually equated with winning.
Not how I was using the term:
Paragraph 2: