= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
seer comments on Discussion of Slate Star Codex: "Extremism in Thought Experiments is No Vice" - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (110)
Well the fact that it appears to be impossible to get two LessWrongers to agree on whether a given moral theory is coherent and non-arbitrary is not encouraging in that regard.
Because lesswrongians have philosophical superpowers, so if they can't do it, noone can?
But lesswrongian are rather lacking philosophical ordinarypowers, from where I'm standing.
<nitpick>As written, this implies that every LWer holds a different moral theory, which seems obviously false. A better phrasing might be, "There does not appear to be a majority position on morality on LW."</nitpick>
Also, talking about only LWers seems a bit narrow. I would have gone for "moral philosophers in general", actually.