Even if they think there's no right and wrong or whatever, they probably still want to live. Otherwise they would've killed themselves already.
More personally:
I quite dislike and don't get the point about them being atheists. What's the connection?
Killing the children in addition seems entirely stupid because children practically always believe whatever stupid stuff you tell them. So they're basically killing someone who can't really make a reasonable judgement.
I quite dislike and don't get the point about them being atheists. What's the connection?
The connection is that the whole point of Phil Robertson's spiel was a criticism of atheism and atheists, the idea being that because atheists can't get their moral values from God they don't, or shouldn't, or can't coherently, have moral values at all (and, allegedly, therefore aren't in a position to complain if their family is abused and murdered and they are mutilated).
That's all kinds of wrong, and Scott understands that; the only thing he's defending is one sp...
Link to Blog Post: "Extremism in Thought Experiments is No Vice"
_____
_____
This is a LW discussion post for Yvain's blog posts at Slate Star Codex, as per tog's suggestion:
Scott/Yvain's permission to repost on LW was granted (from facebook):