knb comments on What are "the really good ideas" that Peter Thiel says are too dangerous to mention? - Less Wrong

2 Post author: James_Miller 12 April 2015 09:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: knb 14 April 2015 12:45:20AM 0 points [-]

Regarding NASA and research suppression, I have an extremely difficult time understanding what could draw you to that conclusion.

Don't misrepresent what I said. I did not state I had made a "conclusion." My reason for wondering about it is that NASA has devoted surprisingly few resources to advanced propulsion research. Something people have been complaining about for years. I think bureaucratic inertia and congressional meddling are more likely explanations, but there is no reason it has to be an either/or.

Comment author: ChristianKl 15 April 2015 10:57:11PM 0 points [-]

Another explanation would be that they consider advanced propulsion research military and therefore classified the research they do.

Comment author: CellBioGuy 15 April 2015 10:35:50PM 0 points [-]

Apologies for wording. Agreement on there being annoying issues that are cause for thought. On top of that I think it's clear they could even be doing more with the technologies they currently have.