Comment on Open Thread, Apr. 27 - May 3, 2015

Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:32:01 GMT

Eh, I have a problem with the current "sex ed" model because of the trend towards exclusion of more and more boys from the possibility of having sex lives, a trend thoroughly analyzed and discussed in Manosphere blogs dealing with love-shyness, involuntary celibacy and PUA. Also refer to my downvoted and currently hidden post above about some idiot sex expert's ideas about the future of sexbots and orgasmatrons in an essay she published on the website of the Wall Street Journal, of all places.

Basically I find it, well, cruel, to teach these boys about sexual experiences that girls could quite possibly withhold from them indefinitely because the boys don't meet young women's emotionally immature criteria for sex appeal. I would like to make sure that the sexually laggard boys get their sexual debut at an appropriate age, and that means setting aside our inherited religious superstitions about fornication and the like out of practical necessity. if these boys need to see prostitutes, with the approval of their parents, and with the permission of legal and medical authority figures, to overcome this hurdle - well, at one time that idea would have bothered me. But I have come around to seeing it as highly preferable to leaving the sexual debut to the haphazard in the current environment where more and more boys will likely wind up alienated from society through sexual eviction. Sex as a rite of passage signals to the young man, "Welcome to the tribe."

Discuss