advancedatheist comments on When does technological enhancement feel natural and acceptable? - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 01 May 2015 09:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: advancedatheist 03 May 2015 04:51:21AM 6 points [-]

I follow his career with a perverse kind of fascination just to see how aggressive self-promotion works. Two years ago I had never heard of this guy, though he does have a media trail on the internet. Now he has figured out how to get invited to all kinds of H+ related conferences so that he can plug his novel, argue for the imminence of all kinds of radical transformations in the human condition due to allegedly accelerating technology, and make the case for a transhumanist political party in the U.S. with himself as the presidential candidate.

Case in point: He will speak at a conference in Palm Springs next month, along with several other individuals whose names you might recognize, hosted by something called the Brink Institute:

http://brinkinstitute.org/

Comment author: CellBioGuy 03 May 2015 06:42:01AM 3 points [-]

I can say that whenever he speaks about biology his claims are an order of magnitude more inane than the usual ones I see made by others.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 07 May 2015 02:17:47AM 0 points [-]

Is there a standard metric for inanity of biological claims?

Comment author: CellBioGuy 07 May 2015 04:32:40AM *  1 point [-]

Hmmm... we could define one.

We might need multiple axes though. One for thermodynamic implausiblity, one for dammit-thats-not-how-it-works-at-all / misapplication of programming concepts to chemistry, one for do-you-realize-how-complicated-what-you-just-suggested-is.