Slider comments on Gasoline Gal looks under the hood (post 1 of 3) - Less Wrong

4 Post author: torekp 03 May 2015 08:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Slider 04 May 2015 06:58:06PM *  0 points [-]

Isn't fuel cell just a hydrogen burner? Isn't that a form of internal combustion? If the seller would have just said that it is a internal combustion engine would he have lied and just avoided an unnneccesary theorethical allergy?

Comment author: torekp 05 May 2015 12:57:58AM 0 points [-]

Even if fuel cells contain combustion, such an engine isn't called an "internal combustion engine". Conventional meanings apply to longer phrases, not just individual words. (I'm not sure on the exact definition of "combustion", but the top Google result is "rapid chemical combination of a substance with oxygen, involving the production of heat and light." I doubt the temperature of a fuel cell reaction zone gets high enough for more than a rare photon of visible light. The temperature in a gasoline or diesel cylinder definitely does.)