ChristianKl comments on Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Richard_Loosemore 05 May 2015 02:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (343)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 May 2015 12:03:10PM 0 points [-]

In general scientists do a lot of experiments where they make predictions about learning and those predictions turn out to be false. That goes for predictions based on RL as well as prediction based on other models.

Wikipedia describes RL as:

Reinforcement learning is an area of machine learning inspired by behaviorist psychology, concerned with how software agents ought to take actions in an environment so as to maximize some notion of cumulative reward.

Given that's an area of machine learning you usually don't find psychologists talking about RL. They talk about behaviorism. There are tons of papers published on behaviorism and after a while the cognitive revolution came along and most psychologists moved beyond RL.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 11 May 2015 01:35:40PM *  0 points [-]

Given that's an area of machine learning you usually don't find psychologists talking about RL. They talk about behaviorism.

Not quite true, especially not if you count neuroscientists as psychologists. There have been quite a few papers by psychologists and neuroscientists talking about reinforcement learning in the last few years alone.