OrphanWilde comments on The Mr. Hyde of Oxytocin - Less Wrong

4 Post author: theowl 10 May 2015 12:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 11 May 2015 06:32:24PM 1 point [-]

This would mean social cues are really bad at reliably conveying information. That seems detrimental to both signalers and recipients. Why wouldn't people evolve better cues, or supplement with more explicit signaling, like words?

Because social cues are about lying more effectively, not conveying information reliably.

Comment author: DanArmak 11 May 2015 06:37:24PM 0 points [-]

Whether or not a cue is truthful, what's surprising is the idea that it would be unclear - that people would disagree on what it's intended to mean.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 11 May 2015 06:40:20PM 1 point [-]

Disagreements on interpretations of social cues between romantic partners with respect to a third party are, I think, a matter of trope at this point. Whether or not they're genuinely disagreeing is a different matter, but given that context, ambiguity is the mark of a good execution of a social cue.