= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
NancyLebovitz comments on Thoughts on minimizing designer baby drama - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (194)
Thanks for including a "just want to see the results" option, though a question for that might have been better. I assume the 9999's are screwing up the means.
Would anyone who thought the tech would be available in the fairly near future be willing to explain their line of thought?
http://lesswrong.com/lw/m6b/thoughts_on_minimizing_designer_baby_drama/cd1x
I thought about that - but then some value still would be needed for the numeric result.
The mean you mean I guess.
I recommend looking at the raw numbers - it is easy.
You're right. I meant the mean-- I've corrected it.