More knowledge about bias, which would particularly undermine the unfortunately common and well regarded stance "I only believe what I see". People rely too much on their direct feelings/intuitions without assessing them.
The idea that in order to have an accurate representation of reality, one must have background knowledge in science. Add in a little philosophy (recent philosophy, like Popper).
Also praising the ones who admit their mistakes - that happens too little.
The final idea would be like yours, more Bayesian thinking.
I'm probably too optimistic.
The final idea would be like yours, more Bayesian thinking.
What do you mean with that? Especially while you try to treat Popper as an important thinker?
My favorite is that people get credit for updating based on evidence.
The more common reaction is for people to get criticized (by themselves and others) for not having known the truth sooner.