John_Maxwell_IV comments on The Best Popular Books on Every Subject - Less Wrong

13 Post author: iarwain1 19 May 2015 01:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 21 May 2015 01:08:04PM 3 points [-]

I agree with you about popular books. But I am wondering about the term "insight porn"--does it do anything besides put a negative connotation on the process of obtaining new insights? (If "insight porn" refers to useless insights, would it be appropriate to say something like "pure math is full of insight porn"? :P)

Comment author: SolveIt 22 May 2015 09:37:56AM 3 points [-]

The way I've heard it used is to describe activities that give you the illusion of understanding a complex subject. Examples would be Malcolm Gladwell's books, or the high school student who thinks they understand quantum mechanics after reading The Elegant Universe. So that usage wouldn't fit pure maths, since we seem to generally agree that pure mathematicians have a true understanding of their fields, even if we don't agree on the value of said fields.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 22 May 2015 01:23:23PM 2 points [-]

Makes sense. It might be useful to score models based on how much they improve your predictions, e.g. Newtonian physics is not completely accurate but improves my predictions substantially vs not knowing any physics.