AdeleneDawner comments on The Amazing Virgin Pregnancy - Less Wrong

22 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 24 December 2007 02:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (271)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 01 May 2011 08:47:08AM 1 point [-]

Interestingly, it seems to me that this definition would produce meta-maxims more readily than normal ones - "find out what your local society's norms are and stick to those" rather than "don't eat babies", for example.

Eliezer's Babyeaters and Superhappies both seemed to follow that meta-rule. (It was less obvious for the latter, but the fact that they had complex societies with different people holding different set roles strongly implies it.)

Comment author: Perplexed 01 May 2011 02:31:48PM 0 points [-]

Interestingly, it seems to me that this definition would produce meta-maxims more readily than normal ones - "find out what your local society's norms are and stick to those" rather than "don't eat babies", for example.

Yes, it does produce meta-maxims in some sense. But meta-maxims can provide useful guidance. "Do unto others ..." is a meta-maxim. So is "Don't steal (anything from anybody)" or "Don't lie (about anything to anyone)"

As to whether this definition leads to the meta-maxim "find out what your local society's norms are and stick to those", that is explicitly not a consequence of this definition. Instead, the meta-maxim would be "work out what your local society's norms should be and set an example by doing that".