ChristianKl comments on Stupid Questions June 2015 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Gondolinian 31 May 2015 02:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (195)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 31 May 2015 03:28:23PM 3 points [-]

Why isn't it more ethical to produce as many children as will fit in a female's lifespan?

Rescuing lives in the third world is cheaper than getting children, if your goal is altruism. On the other hand altruism isn't the only reason to get children.

Comment author: Jiro 01 June 2015 03:54:39PM 0 points [-]

If your goal is altruism, and you value all people equally, anyway. Not many people outside of here do.

Comment author: ChristianKl 01 June 2015 04:05:24PM 1 point [-]

If your goal isn't altruism then why ask "Why isn't it more ethical to produce as many children as will fit in a female's lifespan?". Simply get as many children as you want to have.

Comment author: Jiro 01 June 2015 06:11:32PM 0 points [-]

The "and" in my reply connects two separate conditions. It is possible that your goal is altruism but you don't value people equally. The question of whether having many children is ethical could depend on exactly what factors you use to weigh your children over strangers.