Remco comments on On Expressing Your Concerns - Less Wrong

25 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 27 December 2007 04:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (31)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Remco 05 January 2008 10:00:24AM 2 points [-]

Another thing from software development: I know companies that try to decrease this effect when making estimates in planning, by giving every team member a stack of cards with possible guesses (1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 5 days, etc). Each member chooses a card in secret, then everybody turns theirs over at the same moment. If everybody more or less agrees, then that value is chosen. If there's disagreement, they talk more (typically people who chose outliers get to explain why), then the procedure is repeated.

First step is clearly good, in the second step conformity is probably a factor again.

Another interesting point (not for this discussion, but for software estimates :-)) is that the numbers on the cards are the fibonacci series, and they don't actually have hours or days, but "points". The project leader has historical data that tells him how long one "point" actually took in past projects.

Comment author: orthonormal 06 December 2011 04:14:25PM 0 points [-]

An obvious fix is to make this a secret ballot- shuffle together the chosen answers and set aside the others. This would make it far easier to dissent. The dissenter might choose not to speak up if the group asks who the dissenter was, but the mere presence of the outlier should spur debate.