ChristianKl comments on Are conferences an inefficient/terrible discussion forum (in addition to academic papers)? - Less Wrong

4 Post author: InquilineKea 04 June 2015 07:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 05 June 2015 09:59:43AM 1 point [-]

Do you attribute the main information exchange to have happened in formal discussion (things on the agenda) or to chatting more informally?

Comment author: CellBioGuy 05 June 2015 06:03:02PM *  5 points [-]

Both were important. Formal discussions and things on the agenda were great for seeing the general state of the art and how people were doing things and how our lab could improve, as well as going through the list of sessions and saying 'oh wow that looks fascinating' and getting exposed to new ideas. But my own research got the most direct benefit from unstructured talking with other researchers and people seeing my name and research on the list of posters and coming by to talk, and vice versa.