Lumifer comments on Lesswrong, Effective Altruism Forum and Slate Star Codex: Harm Reduction - Less Wrong

13 Post author: diegocaleiro 08 June 2015 04:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (150)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 10 June 2015 03:24:02PM *  0 points [-]

It often takes a special effort to -notice- that a criticism isn't meaningful, especially when it is correct

True -- but I think it's a very useful skill to develop and practice.

pedantry tends to get upvoted

And that is probably a feature of the local culture by now, heavily supported by the meme of how you can't make even one tiny little itty bitty mistake when programming the AI because if you do it's all paperclips all the time.

I'd lean towards implementing an applause-lights keyword

I call such things "technically correct, but irrelevant", but I don't think this expression functions well as an applause-lights switch. Ideas?

Comment author: OrphanWilde 10 June 2015 05:18:10PM 1 point [-]

The best opposite to "pedantry" I can come up with is "pragmatic." Pragmatism is a relatively good value on Less Wrong, but I don't see a good application.

Yours seems good. It concedes the argument attempted to be raised, shutting off further discussion - a very desirable quality when dealing with somebody who is specifically looking for something to argue with - and rebuts the fundamental problem, redirecting future attention there. (Minor shift for reasons I have trouble explicating, but which seems a stronger, slightly harsher version of the sentiment - "Technically correct. Also irrelevant.") If it's used appropriately, and consistently, I think it could become an applause-light within the sub-culture here.