DanArmak comments on When does heritable low fitness need to be explained? - Less Wrong

15 Post author: DanArmak 10 June 2015 12:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (146)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 10 June 2015 10:23:15PM 0 points [-]

People have always sometimes adopted the children of near relatives who couldn't care for them, at much higher rates than adopting strangers; that's fitness increasing. It's not a stretch to imagine that crossing over to sperm and egg donations.

Both friends and family have the large advantage (at least I imagine it to be so) that they are known quantities: you know them well and can evaluate them as biological parents just as you would a potential mate. I wonder why sperm banks don't seem to offer the sperm of people with known qualities at higher prices: not just screened for diseases, but known to have strong positive traits like good looks and intelligence.