Creutzer comments on Beyond Statistics 101 - Less Wrong

19 Post author: JonahSinick 26 June 2015 10:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (129)

Comments (129)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Creutzer 02 July 2015 05:11:09AM 0 points [-]

You could charitably understand everything that such people (who assert that metaphysics is BS) say with a silent "up to empirical equivalence". Doesn't the problem disappear then?

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 02 July 2015 05:14:08AM 2 points [-]

No because you need a theory of metaphysics to explain what "empirical equivalence" means.

Comment author: Creutzer 02 July 2015 08:40:26AM *  0 points [-]

To be honest, I don't see that at all.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 03 July 2015 01:29:42AM 1 point [-]

So how would you define "empirical equivalence"?

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit