minusdash comments on Autism, or early isolation? - Less Wrong

17 Post author: JonahSinick 17 June 2015 08:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 June 2015 01:59:05PM *  5 points [-]

Alternative hypothesis 2

(At this point I should point out that I like your hypothesis, I just think it is not necessarily single-cause)

Satoshi Kanazawa's charmingly simple theory that general intelligence tends to suppress and displace most of your instincts. This means being smart pretty much automatically means being bad at a lot of things. The way I interpret it is that attention is a finite resource and you either pay attention to your analytical engine or your instincts or share it, but you cannot give full 100% attention to both. So if the analytical engine demands your attention the insticts shut up/down.

I have observed intelligent people being bad at the following instinctive things (not all of them, not in all of these):

  • social skills
  • motoric skills, hand-eye coordination like basketball
  • 3D geometry i.e. toolmanship, fixing the plumbing or the lawn mower at home, being a handyman
  • drawing
  • music, singing
  • balance
  • rythm, dancing
Comment author: minusdash 23 June 2015 05:17:03PM 6 points [-]

This may be a case of ignoring people who are bad in both intellectual and physical things. Those people are just not salient, the same way as people think smart people are ugly and beautiful people are dumb. It may simply be that the ugly and dumb people go unnoticed. This is Berkson's paradox: Even if A and B are independent, they are dependent conditioned on (A or B).

Comment author: [deleted] 29 June 2015 07:23:02AM *  0 points [-]

It may simply be that the ugly and dumb people go unnoticed.

Absolutely. The stereotype of the smart geek/nerd comes from the fact that when people are ugly/socially awkward/weird, other people get positively surprised that they are smart and really notice that. It is like, they would pretty much "written them off" as low-status unimportant people to be ignored, and thus they get surprised that they actually have useful virtues, and should not be so easily ignored because while how they say things is not popular, what they say is often true and insightful.

While the dumb nerd/geek just gets ignored forever.