Epictetus comments on Praising the Constitution - Less Wrong

-6 Post author: dragonfiremalus 27 June 2015 04:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Epictetus 27 June 2015 06:00:16PM 1 point [-]

the President does have, as part of his oath of office, defending the Constitution, which presumably could require him to stop an insane SCOTUS out to wreck everything

That came up in one of the Federalist papers:

The judiciary...has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society, and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.

--Federalst No. 78

Andrew Jackson infamously ignored a Supreme Court ruling in Worcester v. Georgia.