Kindly comments on Two-boxing, smoking and chewing gum in Medical Newcomb problems - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Caspar42 29 June 2015 10:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (93)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Kindly 29 June 2015 07:21:54PM 0 points [-]

In the classic problem, Omega cannot influence my decision; it can only figure out what it is before I do. It is as though I am solving a math problem, and Omega solves it first; the only confusing bit is that the problem in question is self-referential.

If there is a gene that determines what my decision is, then I am not making the decision at all. Any true attempt to figure out what to do is going to depend on my understanding of logic, my familiarity with common mistakes in similar problems, my experience with all the arguments made about Newcomb's problem, and so on; if, despite all that, the box I choose has been determined since my birth, then none of these things (none of the things that make up me!) are a factor at all. Either my reasoning process is overridden in one specific case, or it is irreparably flawed to begin with.

Comment author: Unknowns 30 June 2015 03:47:36AM *  0 points [-]

This is like saying "if my brain determines my decision, then I am not making the decision at all."

Comment author: Kindly 30 June 2015 05:08:29AM 0 points [-]

Not quite. I outlined the things that have to be going on for me to be making a decision.

Comment author: Unknowns 30 June 2015 07:11:54AM 0 points [-]

You cannot assume that any of those things are irrelevant or that they are overridden just because you have a gene. Presumably the gene is arranged in coordination with those things.