Stuart_Armstrong comments on Top 9+2 myths about AI risk - Less Wrong

44 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 29 June 2015 08:41PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Bugmaster 09 July 2015 04:03:59AM 0 points [-]

My own set of objections to AI risk does not include any of these (except possibly #7); but it's possible that they are unusual and therefore do not qualify as "top 10". Still, FWIW, I remain unconvinced that AI risk is something we should be spending any amount of resources on.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 09 July 2015 09:28:14AM 1 point [-]

"any amount of resources on."

That's a very strong statement, denoting very high certainty. Do you have a good basis for it?

Comment author: Bugmaster 10 July 2015 04:35:42AM 0 points [-]

See my response to Caspar42, below. I'll write up my thoughts and post them, this way I have something to link to every time this issue comes up...