= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
turchin comments on You are (mostly) a simulation. - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (102)
Now you just repeating Bostrom simulation argument. But why you rewrite early post is not clear as it will be misleading for commenters.
Certainly not. The simulation argument just talks about one universe. I'm taking the multiverse into account.
If we are in simulated universe, you don't have to worry. With high probability (99%) the outer universe is also simulation.
Matrioshka universe is not stable because glitch on any level will terminate downlevel
If they are using backups on their simulators/computers, they just restart from the last backup. Therefore if the root universe is using backups and all simulated are copy from the root, the system is stable. The restart is not visible inside the simulated universe.
yes, it is obvious patch it Bostrom's logic. If you continue it, you may conclude that cheap simulation are more numerous. "Cheap" means this that physics detalisation is poor and probably it is simulation of just one person - you.
You haven't properly read my argument. That's exactly what I say- but also that the simulation is designed around a real experience.