I have been arguing and debating politics online for over 7 years now and I am quite used to how people speak to each other.

That's the problem. Most relevant political discussions that have real world effects don't happen online. Knowing how to debate politics online and actual knowing how politics processes work are two different things.

By the way, reread the blog post you criticize as making no specific proposal. There is a specific proposal there: based on the social science, remove fuel 1 from the two-fuel fire needed to spark a terrorist into being.

That's no specific proposal. The fact that you think it is suggests that you haven't talked seriously to people who make public policy but only to people on the internet who are as far removed from political processes as you are.

It's like people who are outside of mathematical academia writing proofs for important mathematical problems. They usually think that their proofs are correct because they aren't specific enough about them to see the problems that exist with them.

If your whining about spelling errors is the best shot you have,

I read one post and gave my impression of it. The spelling errors reduce the likelihood that reading other posts would be valuable, so I stopped at that point. If you are actually interested in spreading your ideas, that's valuable information for you.