CellBioGuy comments on Stupid Questions August 2015 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Grothor 01 August 2015 11:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (129)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stingray 02 August 2015 08:24:56PM 13 points [-]

Is it possible to tame an octopus? Could humanity over several generations tame octopuses and breed them into work animals?

Comment author: CellBioGuy 02 August 2015 08:35:18PM 7 points [-]

Most of them are pretty darn short-lived, despite their intelliigence...

Comment author: Evan_Gaensbauer 03 August 2015 01:38:20AM 3 points [-]

Bonus Stupid Question

I remember reading about how some biologists took some wild foxes, and allowed ones which were friendlier to humans to breed. In the next generation of fox offspring, they let the friendliest ones of those litters reproduce. They repeated this several times. After some number of generations, they found these friendliest of foxes had droopy ears like domesticated dogs. This demonstrates how a simple process of artificial selection, like just selecting for friendlier animal companions, may have been sufficient to lead to the domestication of dogs.

Now, my question is, could we humans do the same thing with octopi? Could we just take a population of octopi, and identify the ones which can meaningfully interact with humans in a friendly and docile way, and let them breed, and iterate this process until we have some kind of domesticated octopi?

If they're not long-lived, they wouldn't make good work animals, but I want to know if octopi could at all be domesticated regardless. The fact they're short-lived might mean humans could breed domesticated octopi even faster.

Comment author: Halfwitz 03 August 2015 05:02:04AM 7 points [-]

I imagine a lot of the selection was indirect selection for neoteny. I think it would be much, much harder to select for domestication in octopi, as they do not raise their young.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 03 August 2015 12:18:35PM 4 points [-]
Comment author: Ishaan 04 August 2015 02:46:36AM *  3 points [-]

I'd speculate that if you did an identical breeding experiment with octopuses (as in, the breeding criteria of non-aggressively interaction with human hand) you'd breed for curious, bold, or playful octopuses which tend to approach novel stimuli ... but not friendly in the sense of affectionate.

It's not that they're asocial, I think they sometimes lay eggs cooperatively and obviously seek each other out for mating... but primarily octopuses see others of their species as predators or prey. (I mean, cats do eat each other but only in bounded contexts, like infanticide, not hunting.)

Comment author: ZankerH 04 August 2015 01:31:33PM 1 point [-]

octopi

Octopuses / octopodes. It's greek, not latin.

Comment author: D_Alex 06 August 2015 07:51:58AM 1 point [-]

Or could we breed them for intelligence...? With such short periods between generations, we could reach superintelligence, maybe faster than other methods!

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 August 2015 08:20:42AM 0 points [-]

What could go wrong with breeding a species that hunts their own as prey as a superintelligence?

Comment author: Pfft 03 August 2015 11:13:59PM 1 point [-]

I would imagine that using foxes give you a lot more to work with though. Foxes in nature live in pairs or small groups. The children stay around the parent for a long time. So they already have mechanisms in place for social behaviours. (And even if they are not expressed, there probably are some latent possibilities shared among mammals? E.g. this article about the evolution of housecats notes that they independently evolved a lot of the same behaviours that lion prides use to socialise, even though wildcats are solitary.)