Comment on Open thread, Aug. 03 - Aug. 09, 2015

Tue, 04 Aug 2015 21:53:25 GMT

The question is, how do I tell (without reading all the literature on the topic) if my argument is naive and the counterarguments that I haven't thought of are successful, or if my argument is valid and the counterarguments are just obfuscating the truth in increasingly complicated ways?

Discuss