Jiro comments on Rationality Quotes Thread September 2015 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: elharo 02 September 2015 09:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (482)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jiro 30 September 2015 04:02:20PM 2 points [-]

When animals have a strong tendency to do certain things, e.g. eat or engage in sex, those things tend to be pleasant to the animal.

How do you know that? (For central examples of "animal").

Comment author: Lumifer 30 September 2015 04:51:23PM 3 points [-]

Think about someone who owns a dog.

Comment author: Jiro 01 October 2015 03:37:14AM 0 points [-]

I did. How do you know that? You can't read the dog's mind and the dog can't talk to you. The dog could act in ways that you interpret as the dog being pleased, but trying to interpret it that way here would be circular reasoning since you are trying to show that the dog's actions show that things are pleasant to it.

Comment author: Lumifer 01 October 2015 02:31:57PM 0 points [-]

What are you claiming -- that a dog is inherently unable to have "pleasant" feelings, or that humans have no capability whatsoever to judge the what's happening in the mind of a dog on the basis of its behaviour?

Comment author: Jiro 01 October 2015 04:01:43PM 1 point [-]

In this context, you are claiming that "when animals have a strong tendency to do certain things, those things tend to be pleasant to the animal". Judging what is happening in the mind of the animal on the basis of its behavior, in order to support this claim, is circular reasoning.

Comment author: Lumifer 01 October 2015 04:08:09PM 0 points [-]

you are claiming

Nope, that's not me, that's entirelyuseless.

But you haven't answered my question.

Comment author: Jiro 01 October 2015 08:54:10PM 1 point [-]

Nope, that's not me, that's entirelyuseless.

Sorry. Make that "you are supporting a claim that..."

But you haven't answered my question.

If you want the literal answer to your question, the answer is that I'm not claiming anything.

Note that disputing a claim of X is not itself a claim of not-X..

Comment author: entirelyuseless 01 October 2015 12:21:56PM 2 points [-]

The same way I know that you are a conscious being. In other words by comparing the way they behave with the way I behave.

Comment author: Jiro 01 October 2015 04:03:57PM 0 points [-]

That would imply that a bacterium engaging in things that feel pleasant to it. After all, like me, it tries to avoid things that cause it harm and tries to do things that benefit it.

It would also imply that a Roomba is engaging in things that feel pleasant to it.

Comment author: soreff 02 October 2015 03:49:04AM 1 point [-]

obligatory xkcd response:

http://xkcd.com/1558/