TheAncientGeek comments on Rationality Quotes Thread September 2015 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: elharo 02 September 2015 09:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (482)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 05 October 2015 10:12:30AM 2 points [-]

Zombie=driven determinstitcally by their own inner workings, inherently predictable.

Puppet=controlled by an external force, not necessarily predictable, since the Puppeteer could be controlling them whimsically.

Comment author: CCC 06 October 2015 09:11:19AM 1 point [-]

In that case, it sounds like the "zombie" is the atheistic no-free-will scenario, while the "puppet" is the theistic no-free-will scenario?

In that case, my argument is that the fact that people oppose each other quite strongly at times seems to suggest that we are not puppets but neither confirms nor denies the zombie hypothesis.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 06 October 2015 01:59:54PM *  2 points [-]

In that case, it sounds like the "zombie" is the atheistic no-free-will scenario, while the "puppet" is the theistic no-free-will scenario?

Yep.

In that case, my argument is that the fact that people oppose each other quite strongly at times seems to suggest that we are not puppets

I don't see that. We make our own puppets fight, eg in video games.

Comment author: CCC 07 October 2015 10:47:39AM 2 points [-]

I don't see that. We make our own puppets fight, eg in video games.

...you make an excellent point. In fact, I think you've pretty much invalidated my entire (presented) argument for free will given the existence of God.

I have an alternative argument in favour of free will (given the existence of God) if you'd like to have a look over it - it requires not just God, but a (at least vaguely) benevolent God, which is why I didn't present it earlier (it requires more assumptions therefore it is a weaker argument).

In short, the alternative argument runs as follows; start with the assumption of a benevolent God (and noting the lack of malevolence in the laws of physics as at least weak evidence for the benevolence of a deity). Note that humans, unlike the laws of physics, are capable of being malevolent towards each other; extremely malevolent, in some cases. If they were puppets of a generally benevolent God, then that malevolence is out of place; and this is therefore evidence in favour of free will. (This also implies that God considers free will more important than preventing malevolence).