I would expect heavier tails than that. (For other questions besides that of gods, too.) I'd expect that there might be dozens of reasons providing half a bit or so.
Fair enough. That 80% figure was kindof pulled out of nowhere, really.
For what it's worth, I might rate it at maybe 7 bits. Whether I'm a reasonable and intelligent person isn't for me to say :-).
You think the theistic explanation might be as much as a hundred times more complex?
...there may be some element of my current position biasing my estimate, but that does seem a little excessive.
Whether I'm a reasonable and intelligent person isn't for me to say :-).
So far as this debate goes, my impression is that you either are both reasonable and intelligent or you're really good at faking it.
as much as a hundred times more complex?
No, as much as seven bits more complex. (More precisely, I think it's probably a lot more more-complex than that, but I'm quite uncertain about my estimates.)
really good at faking it
Damn, you caught me. (Seriously: I'm pretty sure that being really good at faking intelligence requires intelligence. I'm not so sure about reasonable-ness.)
Another month, another rationality quotes thread. The rules are: