Dominic comments on Expecting Beauty - Less Wrong

16 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 12 January 2008 03:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (6)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dominic 12 January 2008 09:40:22AM 0 points [-]

Given the set:  {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...} And asked to identify the next number, the answer is:  156 For the sequence is obviously generated by the following formula:  ((n - 1) * (n - 2) * (n - 3) * (n - 4) * (n - 5)) + (n ^ 2)

It is left to the reader to manipulate the formula into an unreadable form, so that it's hard to see how it works. Especially fun is adding an irrational multiplier to the '(n - 1) * ... * (n - 5)' part.

And notice this method works for any sequence given to a finite number of elements, for, indeed, there are an infinite number of fully-specified sequences that fit.

That's what I call beauty.